hnood190 Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 I've been working on this document because I saw that people needed rules to become more clear. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sO34r3LjKP7DppoMccBULbkNewRf9xAhRVu32FRpJdU/edit?usp=sharing I chose google docs to make it easier for me to edit things and can add people to it to if I need to. PS. If there's anything I've forgotten or left out, or you just don't understand clearly. I'll try to update the document and answer your questions. I am also thinking of making more docs like this about cloud gaming. Already got some things in mind, but tell me what you think this community needs. Curski, WsWinter, Ice Cube and 4 others 2 5 Link to comment
Thias Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 Cool idea, I've corrected some spelling for you to accept hnood190 1 Link to comment
Turtle Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 I feel like most of these are pretty self explanatory, especially 1.3 and 1.7 -- if someone is AFK when needed for a sit usually I just put text screen up saying something along the lines of '/pm Turtle when you're back, if you leave you will be banned for LTA.' However I think that it would be difficult to prove that someone had the knowledge of them being reported and as a result left, and if that evidence was apparent it would just be common sense to ban them. IMO Rule 1.7 is pretty blatant in its meaning when it says 'third party software ', it already covers everything. Edit: I only saw the top three and didn't scroll down ? Link to comment
hnood190 Posted May 11, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 24 minutes ago, Turtle said: I feel like most of these are pretty self explanatory, especially 1.3 and 1.7 -- if someone is AFK when needed for a sit usually I just put text screen up saying something along the lines of '/pm Turtle when you're back, if you leave you will be banned for LTA.' However I think that it would be difficult to prove that someone had the knowledge of them being reported and as a result left, and if that evidence was apparent it would just be common sense to ban them. IMO Rule 1.7 is pretty blatant in its meaning when it says 'third party software ', it already covers everything. Yes, I understand, they're self explanatory. I made this because some people still have questions about these types of things. It's just to make things more clear. And having the knowledge of being reported is a rare scenario, but it has happened before, it's just an example after all. Link to comment
Turtle Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 13 minutes ago, hnood190 said: Yes, I understand, they're self explanatory. I made this because some people still have questions about these types of things. It's just to make things more clear. And having the knowledge of being reported is a rare scenario, but it has happened before, it's just an example after all. Yeah I understand, some of the rules are pretty vague but at the same time they can't be too long so there just needs to be a balance which can only be found by seeing what problems arise. In relation to the LTA thing, I meant that getting evidence of the person who has been reported being knowledgeable of them being reported and therefore leaving the server/going AFK would be the tricky thing to get(if that makes sense lol) Link to comment
hnood190 Posted May 11, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 Just now, Turtle said: Yeah I understand, some of the rules are pretty vague but at the same time they can't be too long so there just needs to be a balance which can only be found by seeing what problems arise. In relation to the LTA thing, I meant that getting evidence of the person who has been reported being knowledgeable of them being reported and therefore leaving the server/going AFK would be the tricky thing to get(if that makes sense lol) Yeah, I feel you bro. It's pretty difficult. I just put it there for the sake of examples. Link to comment
Noseian Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 Looks very nice. Has this been confirmed to be legible rules so staff can enforce or help with insight? hnood190 1 Link to comment
hnood190 Posted May 11, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 Just now, Chriss said: Looks very nice. Has this been confirmed to be legible rules so staff can enforce or help with insight? Yes, check credits. Riph confirmed it with me. Link to comment
Noseian Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 Just now, hnood190 said: Yes, check credits. Riph confirmed it with me. Lovely stuff. Thanks big man Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now